In response to concerns that Thames Water could fail, health minister Neil O’Brien has sought to reassure customers about their bills and water supply.

According to their bills or availability to water, “absolutely nothing is going to change,” he told Sky News.

Plans were in place “to handle any challenging situations,” he added.

The largest water provider in the UK, which provides services to a quarter of the country’s residents, is attempting to get additional cash as it struggles to pay its bills.

On Wednesday, the government declared that in the worst-case scenario, if Thames Water failed, it would be prepared to take action.

According to Labour MP and Chair of the Business and Trade Committee Darren Jones, “taxpayers will be exposed to the debt and running costs of a very large company” if the government is compelled to take over the management of Thames Water.

According to reports, the corporation is having trouble finding the funding it needs to pay down its $14 billion debt load. The rate of inflation, which has increased dramatically over the past year, is correlated with interest payments on more than half of its debt.

Thames Water has “significant issues to address” and needs to strengthen its “financial resilience,” according to water regulator Ofwat.

It did mention that the business still has access to finances, though. “It has £4.4 billion in cash and committed funding, including £500 million in recent additional shareholder funding.”

Ofwat further stated that it would keep a close eye on the financial stability of UK water firms to make sure “they have the financial backing to deliver for customers and the environment”.

The government was “carefully monitoring” the issue, according to the prime minister’s official spokeswoman, but Ofwat should “in the first instance” be keeping an eye on the financial stability of water providers.

“Ofwat are focused on doing their job to keep companies’ financial resilience under close scrutiny,” the statement continued.

Due to increased debt interest rates and costs like higher energy and chemical prices, other water firms are also under comparable challenges. Last year, Ofwat expressed concern about the financial stability of Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, SES, Southern, and Portsmouth Water.

Yorkshire Water stated that it saw the need of having “robust financial structures in place and we’ve listened to Ofwat’s concerns and taken action,” while Southern Water informed the BBC that its shareholders “continue to be supportive of the business and its financial resilience.”

Ofwat had expressed reservations over the building of a new reservoir, but Portsmouth Water claimed that since the regulator’s remarks, finance for the project had been acquired.

The current economic situation, according to SES Water, has “proved to be a challenge,” but the company is “confident that its financial standing remains strong.”

A number of sewage breaches and releases have led to harsh criticism of Thames Water’s performance. More water escapes from the corporation than from any other UK water utility.

The business has stated that it will keep Ofwat updated on its fundraising efforts.

However, in the event that the company is unable to raise further funds, it may be temporarily taken over by the government until a new buyer is identified, under a special administration regime. Bulb, an energy provider, experienced this in 2021 after experiencing financial troubles.

After only two years in the position, Thames Water’s chief executive Sarah Bentley resigned on Tuesday. It happened a few weeks after she was instructed to decline her bonus due to the way the business handled sewage spills.

She left the company, but the company didn’t explain why. Ms. Bentley had earlier this year attributed the company’s poor performance to sewage management mistakes made before she came.

According to The Times, City veteran Sir Adrian Montague is being considered to succeed Ian Marchant, who was named chairman in 2018, as chairman of Thames Water.

Sir Adrian has already been asked to assist the government. In order to find a solution when British Energy had financial difficulties in 2002, he was appointed chairman of the nuclear power plant operator in the UK.

Inordinate payments
Given the firms’ records on leaks and sewage discharges, there has been criticism of the amount of money paid to investors, through dividends, and to executives since the water companies were privatised.

Water firms have distributed £50.6 billion in dividends between 1991 and 2021.

There is “no doubt there have been excessive payments to executives,” according to Conservative MP and chair of the Environmental Audit Committee Philip Dunne.

“Keep in mind that water firms don’t need to worry about their top line because it is delivered every day without them having to do the job that typical businesses must do, which is for management to concentrate on creating income. Of course, as soon as everyone turns on their taps and begins drinking water, money starts to flow in.

The cost to the taxpayers would likely not be high if the government was compelled to take over the management of Thames Water, according to Prof. David Hall of the University of Greenwich.

He told that if the company enters special administration, the shareholders will suffer because that is what shareholders are for.

Then, instead of renationalization, you should create regional local authority bodies to take over, and you should transfer the corporation to those regional local authorities as a going concern. That is how the rest of the world operates.

A spokesperson for the clean water movement, Feargal Sharkey, told that “no public funds should be used for any kind of bailout for these companies.”

The performer continued by saying that the government may resolve the issue by issuing an enforcement order that would specify how to invest and how to pay off debts.

“The stockholders who invested relatively little money in these companies may suffer greatly as a result. The final result will be debt-free, big, productive firms with a forward-looking outlook, even if it takes five or ten years.

A “strong safety net” was required, according to the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), which speaks for water customers, to shield poor homes from any bill increases that would be used to finance investment.

“Nearly one in four households say they are currently struggling to pay their water bill amid the cost of living crisis, and this will add to their worries,” senior director Mike Keil said.

Water bills have increased, with the average household’s annual bill in England and Wales reaching £448 in 2016.

The post Thames Water: According to the minister, customers’ bills won’t be impacted appeared first on .